八月雅思大小作文合辑

8月2日雅思大作文范文

“ Some people say modern children's games do not develop a wide range of skills, while traditional games can be much better for developing such skills.To what extent do you agree or disagree?”

 

 雅思高分范文 

01

Some argue that children who play modern games may not develop a wide range of skills as those who play traditional games do. I find this idea unconvincing. Without denying the merits of traditional games, I am more in favour of modern games, whose better scientific rationale and diversity make them more desirable.

02

First, modern games are designed based on proven scientific theories and principles, whereas traditional games may not be.[whereas引出比较，并且，由于前半句褒奖的modern games，所有whereas 后的否定词not就是暗示一种批评traditional games] [接下来解释什么叫做are designed based on proven scientific theories and principles，并且在解释的过程中不断“正评价”] When producing games, developers of modern games refer to scientific findings regarding children’s cognitive development, and as a result, the design of those games often aligns with the patterns of children’s development of skills. By marked contrast, traditional games, descending through generations, are based on experience,empirical practice that may be counterproductive. In other words, [引出上一句中counterproductive的详情] traditional games not only fail to promote children’s skills but also limit them. [接下来不断“负评价”traditional games] This crucial difference enables modern games to better foster children’s skills. [最后故意点一下题，但是这个不是必要的，是在这一篇文章里依情况而定的一种临场设计]

03

In addition, modern games are characterized by [“以…为特点”] their variety of types, whereas traditional games are monotonous [“单调的”]. When children play a wide range of games, a broad array of skills may develop accordingly. For example, LEGO bricks promote children’s imagination; playing educational video games lays a foundation of children’s literacy, numeracy as well as reasoning.In comparison, during the play of traditional games, which areconfined [confine: “局限”] to a few types games, players learn merely a limited number of skills. This is another key difference that highlights modern games and overshadows traditional games. 

04

In conclusion, their forms diverse and their design complying with science, modern games are more recommendable than traditional games. Through modern games, it is more likely thatversatile children are cultivated. 

8月2日雅思小作文

2018年8月11日雅思大作文题目

“ Nowadays a large amount of advertising is aimed at children. Some people think this can have negative effects on children and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?”

 «9分达人雅思写作真题还原及解析3»第166-168页有本题解析和高分范文。

 

解析&审题

本题为彻底的旧题，重复的是2014年4月24日和2016年2月20日的旧题，几乎两年就会重出江湖，值得大家关注。其实，广告类话题一直都是雅思作文的常见话题。

本题的关键是：儿童广告被认为对孩子产生了负面影响，那么是不是该禁止针对儿童的广告呢？这类问题，考生可以采取一边倒的论述方式，比如禁止儿童广告，这种结构需要考生找出2-3个禁止儿童广告的理由并加以论证；考生也可以采取双边讨论的方式，既论证儿童广告的价值，又论证其消极影响，最后讨论到底该怎么办。本范文采取种方式，即一边倒地论证儿童广告应该被禁止理由：首先，儿童广告往往过分强调其好玩的一面，从而让孩子觉得学习不需要认真努力；其次，儿童广告往往根据其产品特征，过分夸大这个世界的危险性或者安全性，让儿童对世界产生错误的认识。

以下是唐老师提供的7分范文。

老师笔记

01

Advertisements aimed at children can be seen everywhere these days: TV, newspapers, magazines, and the Internet. While these advertisements do have some benefits - they are informative at least, I am quite convinced that they are more harmful than beneficial to children.

现在到处都是以儿童为目标人群的广告：电视，报纸，杂志，网络。当然，这些广告的确有一些好处，它们至少能提供有用的信息，但我深信它们对儿童的危害远大于益处。

解析
开头引出话题。儿童广告无处不在，并明确提出自己的观点：儿童广告弊大于利。
（2） “While”表示转折。
（3） informative 提供信息的
（4）I am convinced that... 我确信......（= I am sure, I believe)
（5）more harmful than beneficial to... 对......来说弊大于利。

02

In the first place, in order to attract children, many advertisers tend to overemphasise the "fun side" of their products. More often than not they will promote such products as computer games, dolls, animal parks, and so on. I admit these stuff may be important to children, yet too much of them would distract children from their study. Even when they are advertising learning-aid products, the advertisers often claim their products will make children's learning process full of fun. This is really bad because it gives children a false impression that they do not have to put serious efforts into their study. 

首先，为了吸引儿童，许多广告商倾向于过分强调其产品“好玩的方面”。它们时常推广的是像电脑游戏，玩偶，动物园等产品。我承认这些东西对孩子可能十分重要，但是过多接触这些东西会使孩子从学习中分心。即使是推销辅助学习的产品，广告商也通常会宣称他们的产品会让孩子的学习过程充满乐趣。这样做的影响十分恶劣，因为这会给孩子一个错误的印象，使得他们认为学习不必付出努力。

解析
（1） 提出反对儿童广告的个理由：儿童广告过度强调其有趣的方面。论证的时候注意论据的推进：虽然乐趣对儿童十分重要，但过于强调乐趣会使孩子从学习中分心—即使是推广学习辅助产品也过于强调其娱乐性，使孩子不能严肃对待学习。
（2） more often than not (= often, frequently）经常
（3） distract sb. from sth. 使某人从某事中分心
（4） give sb. a false impression 给某人错误的印象

 

03

At the same time, children advertising is partly responsible forchildren being kept away from the reality. Catering to the psychological needs of children, many advertisements describe the world in highly imaginative and unrealistic manners. For instance, when they want to promote their doll weapons, they will describe the world as a place full of bad guys. A child exposed to such advertising may develop a deep sense of hostility to the world. On the other hand, when they want to sell entertainment park tickets to children, they will describe the world as a place full of love and without any danger at all. A child who has been made to believe this kind of advertising will have a hard time when they come across troubles in real life.

同时，儿童广告某种程度上导致了儿童远离现实。为了迎合孩子的心理需求，很多广告用极其富于想象力和不现实的方式描述这个世界。比如说，当广告商想要推广武器玩具时，他们会描述一个充满了坏蛋的世界。一个孩子若是处于这样的广告环境下可能会对世界有很深的敌意。另一个方面，当广告商想售卖游乐园的门票时，他们会描述一个充满爱、没有任何危险的世界。一个孩子如果被影响而相信这类广告，当他/她在现实遇到麻烦的时候就会处境艰难。

解析
（1） 本段提出反对儿童广告的第二个理由：儿童广告导致儿童远离现实，并从两方面举例（要么对世界充满敌意，要么对世界充满美好的幻想）；举例能使得论据丰满而且又有说服力，并且字数也不愁了！
（2） be partly responsible for 对…负部分责任，部分导致......
（3） keep away from reality 远离现实
（4） cater to 迎合......
（5） unrealistic 不现实的
（6） expose (to) 暴露于......
（7） hostility 敌意，仇恨
（8） come across 遇见，遭遇

04

To conclude, since most children advertisements are misleading, they are really harmful to children who are not old enough to tell the difference between imagination and reality. Indeed, these advertisements may provide useful information for children, but these information can be obtained from other more reliable sources. Therefore, my strong suggestion is that children advertising be banned.

总的来说，大多数儿童广告有误导性，对那些年龄幼小还不能够区分想象和现实的孩子来说危害很大。实际上，也许这些广告能为儿童提供有用的信息，但这些信息也可以从其它更可靠的途径获取。因此，我强烈建议儿童广告应该被禁止。
解析
（1） 总结本文观点：由于儿童广告有误导性，因此对还不能区分想象和现实的儿童来说是有害的；尽管这些广告能提供信息，但这些信息可以从更可靠的渠道获得；因而儿童广告应该被禁止。
（2） to conclude 总之（类似词组还有in conclusion，in short，all in all）
（3） misleading 误导性的
（4） tell the difference between…”区分…

本范文中可背诵的句子

1. While these advertisements do have some benefits - they areinformative at least, I am quite convinced that they are more harmful than beneficial to children.
当然，这些广告的确有一些好处，它们至少能提供有用的信息，但我深信它们对儿童的危害远大于益处。
 
2. I admit these stuff may be important to children, yet too much of them would distract children fromtheir study.
我承认这些东西对孩子可能十分重要，但是过多接触这些东西会使孩子从学习中分心。
 
3. Catering to the psychological needs of children, many advertisements describe the world in highly imaginative and unrealistic manners.
为了迎合孩子的心理需求，很多广告用极其富于想象力和不现实的方式描述这个世界。
 
4. To conclude, since most children advertisements aremisleading, they are really harmful to children who are not old enough to tell the difference between imagination and reality.
总的来说，大多数儿童广告有误导性，对那些年龄幼小还不能够区分想象和现实的孩子来说危害很大。

 

雅思7分范文
Advertisements aimed at children can be seen everywhere these days: TV, newspapers, magazines, and the Internet. While these advertisements do have some benefits - they are informative at least, I am quite convinced that they are more harmful than beneficial to children.
In the first place, in order to attract children, many advertisers tend to overemphasise the "fun side" of their products. More often than not they will promote such products as computer games, dolls, animal parks, and so on. I admit these stuff may be important to children, yet too much of them would distract children from their study. Even when they are advertising learning-aid products, the advertisers often claim their products will make children's learning process full of fun. This is really bad because it gives children a false impression that they do not have to put serious efforts into their study. 
    At the same time, children advertising is partly responsible for children being kept away from the reality. Catering to the psychological needs of children, many advertisements describe the world in highly imaginative and unrealistic manners. For instance, when they want to promote their doll weapons, they will describe the world as a place full of bad guys. A child exposed to such advertising may develop a deep sense of hostility to the world. On the other hand, when they want to sell entertainment park tickets to children, they will describe the world as a place full of love and without any danger at all. A child who has been made to believe this kind of advertising will have a hard time when they come across troubles in real life.
    To conclude, since most children advertisements are misleading, they are really harmful to children who are not old enough to tell the difference between imagination and reality. Indeed, these advertisements may provide useful information for children, but these information can be obtained from other more reliable sources. Therefore, my strong suggestion is that children advertising be banned.
(330 words)

2018年8月11日雅思小作文题目

 

2018年8月18日雅思大作文题目

“ Some people think that schools should stop teaching students by using books because students find them boring, and that children can learn from films, TV, video games and computer instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.”

解析&审题

似曾相识燕归来！

在现代社会，学生可以从网络方便快捷地获取信息，那么还要书籍干什么呢？

这个题目，各位烤鸭是不是觉得很熟悉？现在有一种观点，有了网络，我们简直无所不能，其他什么都不需要了：不需要去商店了，不需要博物馆了，不需要旅游了，不需要坐车去上班了，不需要学校了，不需要老师了......这些观点在雅思考试作文中都出现过，唐老师先带大家看看：

2016.8.4
Some people think it's necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries. However, other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the Internet.Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 【不需要旅游了】

2014.10.18
It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn about other cultures. We can learn from books, films and internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 【不需要旅游了】

2014.4.26
People can work and study on the Internet without going to school or the company. Do the
advantages outweigh its disadvantages? 【不需要去上学，不需要去上班了】

2013.7.18
In modern society, it is possible to go shopping, work and communicate via the Internet without face-to-face contact with one another. To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development? 【不需要去购物，去上班，面对面交流了】

2012.1.12
Some people think government should build public libraries in every town. Others believe it is a waste of money because we can get information via internet at home. Discuss both views.【不需要图书馆了】

2010.12.4
Museums are getting less important, when people can have access to information on the Internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 【不需要博物馆了】 

2010.5.15
Some people think that computers and the Internet are more important to a child's education than going to school. However, others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 【不需要学校和老师了】
不难看出，这些题目有一个共同思维模式：有了网络，我们就可以获取各种知识和信息，因此传统的那些知识和信息传播方式都可以抛弃了。那么，就这类题目，我们应该看到双面性：一方面，现代信息科技的确丰富了我们信息获取的路径，让信息获取变得更加便捷容易，但是信息科技并不能取代书籍、学校、图书馆、博物馆，乃至旅游、购物，原因有三：
（1）网络信息庞杂，来源不明，以讹传讹很多，因此不是很可靠(unreliable)；
（2）网络信息零碎（fragmented)，流于肤浅（superficial)，因此不是很系统(systematic)；
（3）网络毕竟是冷冰冰的技术，缺乏人与人交流的温度（warmth），而实地旅游、购物、上学、上班、去博物馆、图书馆会带来一种人际体验(interpersonal contact)，而人际体验是我们人生的重要组成部分(interpersonal contact is an important part of our life’s experience)。

 

老师笔记

01

An increasing number of schools acknowledge the growing influence of technology and have responded by teaching students through films, TV, video games and computer instead of books on paper. Without downplaying the many advantages of learning from screens, there are significant consequences todiscounting the value of leaning from books.

越来越多的学校认识到技术的影响越来越大，并通过电影、电视、电子游戏和电脑来教育学生，而不是纸质的书。从屏幕学习的确有诸多优势，但若对从书本中学习的价值认识不足,会产生很大的影响。

解析
（1） 开头引出话题，并表明态度：传统的书是有价值的。
（2） an increasing number of... 越来越多的......
（3） acknowledge 承认
（4） downplay 贬低
（5） discount 打折扣

02

To begin with, there is a popular assumption that schools should stop teaching students by using books because young people find books boring. Schools in general are motivated to increase screen use across every subject area in the academic curriculum. It is also assumed that students’ preference for screens rather than books would translate into better learning outcomes. Like it or not, theproliferation of screens is here to stay, so schools need to get on board and accept that.

首先，人们普遍认为学校应该停止用书本来教学生，因为年轻人觉得书很无聊。多数学校现在都乐于在课表中的所有科目中都增加屏幕的使用。人们还认为，学生对屏幕而不是书本的偏爱会转化为更好的学习效果。不管你喜不喜欢，屏幕的推广和普及已经存在，所以学校需要跟上时代步伐接受这一事实。

解析
（1） 本段讨论为什么很多学校使用电子手段来教学的原因，是学生觉得书籍很无聊，第二是很多人认为电子教学效果更好。
（2） assumption 假设
（3） motivate 使......有动力
（4） preference 偏好
（5） translate into... 转化为......
（6） like it or not 无论喜欢与否
（7） proliferation 扩散

 

03

However, the use of books at schools is down but not out. Although new forms of classroom technology like digital textbooks are more accessible and portable, it would be wrong to assume  that students are automatically better served by digital reading just because they prefer it. Research suggests that overall comprehension may be better for print versus digital reading, which means that schools should not underestimate the value of using books even in an increasingly digital world. In this respect, teachers could make students aware that their ability to comprehend the texts may be influenced by the medium they choose, but there is no benefit in selecting screens over books. There are reasons to go paperless, of course; but there is clearly something significant that would be lost with print’s demise.

然而，学校使用书虽然不再主导，却不会消失。尽管像数字教材这样的新形式的课堂技术更容易获取，更便于携带，但如果仅仅因为学生喜欢就认为电子阅读自然对学生更有益，那就错了。研究表明，相对于电子阅读，用书对整体理解力可能会更好，这意味着即使在一个日益数字化的世界里，学校也不应该低估使用书籍的价值。在这方面，教师可以让学生意识到他们理解课文的能力可能受到其选择的媒介的影响，而选择屏幕而不是书籍并不益处。当然，无纸化是有理由的，但随着印刷书的消亡，有些重要的东西很明显也会失去。

解析
（1） 本段讨论印刷书不可能完全消失的原因。
（2） down but not out 垂而不死；死而不僵
（3） accessible 可以使用的；可以获得的
（4） portable 便携式的
（5） underestimate 低估
（6） demise （=death）消亡

04

In conclusion, for school children, the benefits of learning from screens are obvious, nevertheless it is important not to entirelyexclude learning from print materials. Books could be boring sometimes, so are screens. After all, there should always be a place for print in students’ academic lives—no matter how technologically savvy they become. 

总之，对学童来说，从屏幕上学习的好处是显而易见的，然而，不把印刷材料完全排除在学习之外也很重要。有些书可能很无聊，但屏幕也同样如此。无论如何，在学生的学习生涯中，书籍总应该占一席之地--无论他们在技术上有多精通。
解析
（1） 总结本文观点：通过电子手段来学习有优势，但不能完全没有印刷的书。
（2） exclude 排除
（3） savvy 精明的；精通的

本范文中可背诵的句子

1. An increasing number of schools acknowledge the growing influence of technology and have responded by teaching students through films, TV, video games and computer instead of books on paper.
越来越多的学校认识到技术的影响越来越大，并通过电影、电视、电子游戏和电脑来教育学生，而不是纸质的书。
 
2. To begin with, there is a popular assumption that schools should stop teaching students by using books because young people find books boring.
首先，人们普遍认为学校应该停止用书本来教学生，因为年轻人觉得书很无聊。
 
3. Research suggests that overall comprehension may be better for print versus digital reading, which means that schools should not underestimate the value of using books even in an increasingly digital world.
研究表明，相对于电子阅读，用书对整体理解力可能会更好，这意味着即使在一个日益数字化的世界里，学校也不应该低估使用书籍的价值。
 
4. After all, there should always be a place for print in students’ academic lives—no matter how technologicallysavvy they become.
无论如何，在学生的学习生涯中，书籍总应该占一席之地--无论他们在技术上有多精通。

 

7分范文
An increasing number of schools acknowledge the growing influence of technology and have responded by teaching students through films, TV, video games and computer instead of books on paper. Without downplaying the many advantages of learning from screens, there are significant consequences to discounting the value of leaning from books.
 
To begin with, there is a popular assumption that schools should stop teaching students by using books because young people find books boring. Schools in general are motivated to increase screen use across every subject area in the academic curriculum. It is also assumed that students’ preference for screens rather than books would translate into better learning outcomes. Like it or not, the proliferation of screens is here to stay, so schools need to get on board and accept that.
 
However, the use of books at schools is down but not out. Although new forms of classroom technology like digital textbooks are more accessible and portable, it would be wrong to assume  that students are automatically better served by digital reading just because they prefer it. Research suggests that overall comprehension may be better for print versus digital reading, which means that schools should not underestimate the value of using books even in an increasingly digital world. In this respect, teachers could make students aware that their ability to comprehend the texts may be influenced by the medium they choose, but there is no benefit in selecting screens over books. There are reasons to go paperless, of course; but there is clearly something significant that would be lost with print’s demise.
 
In conclusion, for school children, the benefits of learning from screens are obvious, nevertheless it is important not to entirely exclude learning from print materials. Books could be boring sometimes, so are screens. After all, there should always be a place for print in students’ academic lives—no matter how technologically savvy they become.
(320 words)
 

2018年8月25日雅思大作文题目

“ Some people say that children should go to school as young as possible, while others believe that children should not start primary school until they are six or seven-years-old. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.”

解析&审题

本周考题要求考生讨论孩子们的上学年龄，这是一个非常古老的题目，同时也是我们在平时生活中经常讨论的话题，因此，唐老师相信这个题目对多数烤鸭来说应该不会陌生。

那么，孩子到底该什么时候去接受正规教育呢？是越小越好，还是到6、7岁后再上？很明显，这个问题是见仁见智的。事实上，的确有很多国家，孩子4、5岁就可以上小学，而在其他一些国家，孩子需要到6、7岁后才能上小学。每个国家当然是根据自己国家的情况来制定政策的。

总体说来，孩子越早上学似乎有利于孩子的学习，同时还可以减轻父母的负担，让他们尽快重返工作岗位；但孩子上学过早也有问题，比如过早让孩子担负学习压力，可能让他们在将来失去学习的兴趣，同时，如果孩子们太小不理解教育的意义，他们未来变成问题学生的几率也会更大。

 

老师笔记

01

There is much debate about when the transition between play-based preschool and the start of formal schooling should begin.For different purposes, the formal school starting age varies from country to country, ranging from four to seven.

关于什么时候开始从以玩耍为基础的学前教育向正规教育转变，有很多争论。出于不同目的，不同国家的正式入学年龄不同，从4岁到7岁均有。

解析
（1） 开头对题目观点进行了重新表述。
（2） debate 争论；讨论
（3） transition 过渡
（4） for different purposes 出于不同目的
（5） vary 与......不同
（6） range from... to... 在......幅度内变化

02

Some people believe that “earlier is better”. On the one hand, children who receive formal instructions at four to five years old will hold advantages over those who start school at six to seven, since formal education can supply a good foundation for children, promoting them to form their own ideas, communicate andsocialize with other students, and develop their knowledge. On the other hand, it may also make it possible for parents to return to the workforce earlier and reduce childcare costs.  

有些人认为“越早越好”。一方面，在四至五岁时接受正式教育的儿童将比六至七岁开始上学的儿童占优势，因为正规教育可以为儿童提供良好的基础，促进他们形成自己的思想，与其他学生进行交流和社交，并发展他们的知识。另一方面，它还可能使父母提前返回劳动力市场，从而降低儿童保育成本。

解析
（1） 本段讨论孩子们越早上学的好处，主要包括孩子的成长，以及对父母的好处。
（2） instructions 指导；教育
（3） supply something for somebody （=provide）为某人提供某物
（4） socialize with... 与......交往

 

03

Other people, however, argue that there will be negativeconsequences if children are forced to receive formal instruction at too early an age. This argument calls for an extension of informal, play-based preschool for the start of formal schooling to be delayed until the age of six to seven. If children are brought into school very young and then they are asked to behave in ways they cannot, they may become problem children later. Abundantevidence has shown that many of improper behaviors stem fromstarting school too early. In the interests of children’s academic achievements and emotional well-being, these evidence should betaken seriously. 

然而，另一些人则认为，如果儿童过早地被迫接受正规教育，会产生负面影响。这个论点呼吁延长非正式的、以玩耍为主的学前阶段，以将正式入学的时间推迟到六岁到七岁。如果孩子很小就被带到学校，然后被要求以他们不能做到的方式做事，他们以后可能会变成有问题的孩子。大量的证据表明，许多不适合的行为都源于过早上学。为孩子的学业成绩和情感利益着想，这些证据值得认真对待。

解析
（1） 本段讨论孩子应该在6-7岁以后上学的理由。
（2） consequence 后果
（3） extension 延长；延伸
（4） problem children 问题孩子
（5） abundant 足够的；大量的
（6） stem from... 源于......
（7） take...seriously 认真对待......

04

In conclusion, although some people think that children should start formal schooling at four to five, others believe that it should be delayed until six to seven. The decision depends on each country’s primary-school educational policy. In many parts of the world, this issue continues to be debatable about which policy is more likely to pay off.

总之，虽然有些人认为儿童应在4至5岁开始正规教育，但另一些人认为应该推迟到6至7岁。这个决定取决于每个国家的小学教育政策。在世界的许多地方，至于哪个政策更可能带来回报，仍有争议。
解析
（1） 总结本文观点：两个观点均有理由，但到底采用哪个观点，则取决于不同国家的政策。
（2） depend on 取决于......
（3） debatable 有待争议的
（4） pay off 取得回报，成功

本范文中可背诵的句子

1. For different purposes, the formal school starting age varies from country to country, ranging from four to seven.
出于不同目的，不同国家的正式入学年龄不同，从4岁到7岁均有。

2. On the one hand, children who receive formal instructions at four to five years old will hold advantages over those who start school at six to seven, since formal education can supply a good foundation for children, promoting them to form their own ideas, communicate and socialize with other students, and develop their knowledge.
一方面，在四至五岁时接受正式教育的儿童将比六至七岁开始上学的儿童占优势，因为正规教育可以为儿童提供良好的基础，促进他们形成自己的思想，与其他学生进行交流和社交，并发展他们的知识。

3. If children are brought into school very young and then they are asked to behave in ways they cannot, they may becomeproblem children later.
如果孩子很小就被带到学校，然后被要求以他们不能做到的方式做事，他们以后可能会变成有问题的孩子。

 

7分范文
There is much debate about when the transition between play-based preschool and the start of formal schooling should begin. For different purposes, the formal school starting age varies from country to country, ranging from four to seven.
Some people believe that “earlier is better”. On the one hand, children who receive formal instructions at four to five years old will hold advantages over those who start school at six to seven, since formal education can supply a good foundation for children, promoting them to form their own ideas, communicate and socialize with other students, and develop their knowledge. On the other hand, it may also make it possible for parents to return to the workforce earlier and reduce childcare costs. 
Other people, however, argue that there will be negative consequences if children are forced to receive formal instruction at too early an age. This argument calls for an extension of informal, play-based preschool for the start of formal schooling to be delayed until the age of six to seven. If children are brought into school very young and then they are asked to behave in ways they cannot, they may become problem children later. Abundant evidence has shown that many of improper behaviors stem from starting school too early. In the interests of children’s academic achievements and emotional well-being, these evidence should be taken seriously.
In conclusion, although some people think that children should start formal schooling at four to five, others believe that it should be delayed until six to seven. The decision depends on each country’s primary-school educational policy. In many parts of the world, this issue continues to be debatable about which policy is more likely to pay off.
(289 words)